BharatBeat
ManipurEthnic ConflictPresident's RuleBJP

Manipur After the Storm: How President's Rule Ended and a Unity Government Took Charge, Explained

After nearly two years of ethnic conflict and a year of direct central rule, Manipur has an elected government again. A new chief minister, deputies from the Kuki and Naga communities, and a dramatic fall in violence mark a fragile new chapter. Here is the full story.

By The Editor5 min read

For almost two years, Manipur was the site of one of India's most painful internal conflicts: a state torn along ethnic lines, its people displaced, its politics frozen. Then, in early 2026, something shifted. Direct rule from Delhi ended, an elected government returned, and the violence that had defined the state fell away almost to nothing. It is a fragile peace, but after everything Manipur endured, it is a genuine turning point.

This is the story of how the storm broke, and what the calmer weather rests on.

The 60-second version

  • The change: President's Rule ended on 4 February 2026, restoring an elected government to Manipur.
  • The new CM: Yumnam Khemchand Singh, leading a reconciliation government with deputy chief ministers from the Kuki and Naga communities.
  • The backdrop: Nearly two years of conflict between the Meitei of the valley and the Kuki-Zo of the hills, from May 2023.
  • The turnaround: Insurgency-linked fatalities fell to one in 2026, from 58 in 2025 and 87 in 2024.
  • The caveat: The peace is real but fragile, and the core disputes are not yet resolved.

How the conflict began

Manipur's crisis erupted in May 2023. At its heart lay a long-running tension between two communities: the Meitei, who form the majority and live mainly in the Imphal Valley, and the Kuki-Zo tribes, who live in the surrounding hill districts. The immediate trigger in 2023 was a court development around the Meitei demand for Scheduled Tribe (ST) status, a designation that carries reservations and land protections.

To the hill tribes, extending ST status to the already-dominant valley community threatened their land and political security. A tribal solidarity march in response spiralled into clashes, and those clashes hardened into a prolonged ethnic conflict that displaced tens of thousands and split the state, physically and politically, into valley and hills.

From resignation to President's Rule

The political system buckled under the strain. In February 2025, Chief Minister N. Biren Singh resigned, and with no replacement able to command confidence across the divide, the Centre imposed President's Rule. For about a year, Manipur was governed directly from Delhi, its assembly kept in suspension while security forces tried to contain the violence.

President's Rule bought time and a measure of control, but it could not, by itself, deliver reconciliation. That would require an elected government that both communities could, however warily, accept.

The return of elected government

On 4 February 2026, President's Rule was revoked. Rather than fresh elections, the existing assembly was reactivated and a new government formed, built deliberately around the idea of inclusion. Yumnam Khemchand Singh became chief minister, and, crucially, deputy chief ministers were drawn from the Kuki and Naga communities, with Govindas Konthoujam taking charge of the sensitive Home portfolio.

The symbolism mattered as much as the arithmetic. After years in which the state government was seen by the hills as partisan, a cabinet that visibly included hill-community leaders was a signal that the new administration intended to govern for all of Manipur, not one half of it.

The signs of calm

The clearest evidence of change is in the numbers. According to data compiled by the South Asia Terrorism Portal, Manipur recorded one insurgency-linked fatality in 2026, against 58 in 2025 and 87 in 2024. From a state that had grown used to near-daily reports of violence, that is a dramatic fall.

There were political signs too. In March 2026, state leaders held a confidence-building meeting with the Kuki-Zo Council in Guwahati, described as the first formal engagement between the two sides in nearly three years. Talking, after so long, is itself progress.

Why it matters

Manipur sits on a sensitive international border and at the heart of India's Northeast, and its stability shapes the wider region. The conflict had also become a national political issue, a test of how the Centre manages ethnic strife in a state it governs in alliance with local partners.

The end of President's Rule and the fall in violence therefore carry weight well beyond the state. If a genuinely inclusive government can hold, it becomes a model for reconciliation. If it fractures, the warning it sends is just as loud.

What each side says

The new state government frames the transition as a return to democratic, representative rule and points to the collapse in violence and the resumption of dialogue as proof that reconciliation is working.

Kuki-Zo representatives, while engaging with the government, continue to press long-standing demands around security, land, and political arrangements for the hills, and caution that calm is not the same as a settlement.

Meitei civil-society voices, for their part, raise their own concerns about displacement, security, and the terms of any lasting deal. The quiet is welcome to all sides, but each reads it differently.

What to watch next

  1. Weapons and security. Recovering looted arms and securing the valley-hill boundary is central to preventing a relapse.
  2. The dialogue track. Whether the Guwahati engagement grows into a sustained peace process or stalls.
  3. Return of the displaced. Real normalcy depends on people being able to go home safely.
  4. The cabinet's cohesion. Whether the cross-community government holds together under pressure, or splinters along the old lines.

Manipur has come back from a very dark place. An elected government is in office, the guns have largely fallen silent, and the two sides are talking again. None of that yet amounts to a settlement, but after two years of conflict, a fragile peace and a government that speaks for the whole state is a beginning worth marking.


This explainer is compiled from public reporting and data from monitoring organisations. Casualty figures are as reported at the time of writing and may be revised. It will be updated as events develop.

Frequently asked questions

Is President's Rule still in force in Manipur?

No. President's Rule, imposed in February 2025 after Chief Minister N. Biren Singh resigned, was revoked on 4 February 2026. An elected government took charge, led by a new chief minister, Yumnam Khemchand Singh, with deputy chief ministers drawn from the Kuki and Naga communities.

What caused the Manipur conflict?

The violence, which erupted in May 2023, is rooted in a dispute between the majority Meitei community, concentrated in the Imphal Valley, and the Kuki-Zo tribes of the surrounding hills. The immediate flashpoint was a 2023 court development around the Meitei demand for Scheduled Tribe status, which triggered tribal protests and then sustained ethnic clashes.

Has the violence in Manipur stopped?

Violence has fallen sharply. According to data compiled by the South Asia Terrorism Portal, the state recorded one insurgency-linked fatality in 2026, compared with 58 in 2025 and 87 in 2024. The situation has improved markedly since the transition from direct central rule to an elected government, though the underlying divisions remain unresolved.

Who is the Chief Minister of Manipur now?

Yumnam Khemchand Singh took charge as Chief Minister when President's Rule ended in February 2026, at the head of a reconciliation-focused government that includes deputy chief ministers from the Kuki and Naga communities, with Govindas Konthoujam handling the Home portfolio.